Shot recognton system nstalled on Vegas street

SUPERIOR GUNSHOT DETECTION TECHNOLOGY

DataBuoy is an independent integrated security and monitoring platform that can instantly detect gunfire and identify the location indoors, outdoors, and vertical. Our robust panic buttons are identified and captured the details of the incident, giving the first respondents to obtain positive results.

Improvement of situation awareness Correspondence with confidence Shortening of response time

DATABUOY IS YOUR DEPENDABLE PARTNER

In the unpredictable world, Databuoy is relied on.

People who are responsible for protecting others recognize potential issues, including the possibility of encountering an active shooter.

DataBuoy has a commitment to give power to the respondents so that these issues can be actively addressed. Please arrange evaluations with the DataBuoy team and see how we can support employees and environmental safety.

ALWAYS AWARE, ALWAYS READY

DataBuoy's reliability that is known to those who know

It is suitable for a partner who has gained the trust of public and private industry leaders and experts. Our gun voice detection platform, known as SHOTPOINT®, has won their trust. The Databuoy system is currently operating in a harsh indoor and outdoor environment, where accuracy and quick response are the top priority. DataBuoy's patented filter prevents misinformation, eliminates the fatigue of responders, and can respond with confidence.

This technology helps my police officer work. Investigator Tim Hall Anapolis police

Databuoy accurately tells you where the shooting has come from and how many shooting criminals are there. This is the best solution in the market, supplementing the human elements to protect users' safety. Databuoy is absolutely necessary in the world today.

Mark Redon Security director Free Mont Street Experience Canopy

We test every month, but databuoy works consistently with multiple shooters. DataBuoy shows the latest shots and the exact location of the sniper. For more than two years, there has never been a mistake ... a great tool that can respond quickly, effective and accurately. I strongly recommend Databuoy.

Former Chief of Brian Pegs Avenula police Cooperation with Adventura schools

DataBuoy, a platform, enables integration with other important factors of the comprehensive security eco system. This leads to efficient and effective detection and reduction of security events. DataBuoy's Shotpoint is a technology we recommend.

Jeff Powers Light House Consultant

Safety Act Designation

DataBuoy Corporation receives SHOTPOINT® US Ministry of Land Security Safety method

The fact that DataBuoy has acquired this designation emphasizes that it contributes to public safety through advanced gun voice detection technology. This designation emphasizes the hig h-level performance and dedication to the reliability of DataBuoy, indicating the accuracy of the technology and the important role in ant i-terrorism. This certification enhances DataBuoy's leadership, which offers innovative and reliable systems to protect life and property.

A CLEAR PLAN OF ACTION

When the response time is important

The technology developed by our Defense Higher Research Planning Bureau (DARPA) will improve safety and security. DataBuoy designs a system that focuses on accuracy, efficiency, and results, and provides clear and practical information, ensuring your security goal.

Step 1 Environment and technical evaluation Identify the area where protection is required and understand your technical environment. Step 2 Introduction proposal and integration plan

Providing the necessary coverage and creating a specific plan designed to meet your technical requirements.

Step 3 Solution installation, testing, training Delivery, installation, test of the SHOTPOINT sensor. The client user setup and training are completed.

SAVES LIVES WITH DATABUOY

Practical information that is notified immediately

With DataBuoy, you can effectively reduce the risk of active shooters, quickly respond to the case, and pursue the criminal's responsibility with specific evidence. Establishing a cooperative approach to the crisis situation caused by the gun shooting case can build a powerful partnership with the first respondents.

Security Technologies that can improve Response at Public Events

July 16, 2024

Many people have questioned whether new security technology has been able to make a difference in the miserable shooting case at a Trump rally recently occurred in the Pennsylvania Batler.

2 minutes to read

Enhancing Public Safety on the 4th of July with Databuoy’s Advanced Gunshot Detection

July 3, 2024

It is important to keep in mind that interest in gun shooting is increasing to celebrate the independent anniversary of July 4. For the past 3 years, the gun shooting case ...

2 minutes to read

Addressing the need for enhanced safety measures

June 27, 2024

In 2024, the Surgeon Director declared that firearm violence was a crisis for public health, emphasizing that comprehensive solutions were urgently needed. In recent years, the spread of violence by guns has escalated.

Read in 3 minutes

Is my business a good fit for this?

FAQ

Do you have any questions? We will answer!

What is a firing detection?

Sound gun voice detection is a technology that uses a sound sensor or microphone to detect and identify the sound signature of gunshots and firing. The sensor operates based on the principle that the firearm is launched by the principle that a characteristic sound pattern occurs, such as a supe r-sound shock wave (explosion of the muzzle) and a Sonic crack when a bullet is transmitted through the air.

The acoustic bullet inspection system is commonly used in urban areas, campuses, public spaces, and strict security facilities, enhancing public safety and supporting quick response to guns. Gunning voice detection plays an important role in reducing the time indispensable for rescue and further violence.

What is SHOTPOINT's localization accuracy?

Outdoors, Shotpoint is within 2 meters of accuracy. Indoors, the accuracy of Shotpoint is usually less than 1 meter.

Where can I use Shotpoint?

Shotpoint is the only system that operates indoors, outdoors, and vertical. All events are tracked through one platform, so multiple integrated solutions are required. It is also effective in high noise environments such as Freemont Street Experience in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Can Databuoy services integrate with a larg e-volume notification system?

yes. Currently integrated with several providers and can be integrated with a syste m-based API as needed.

How will the event notification to the security representative be notified?

DataBuoy is integrated with a larg e-volume notification system. DataBuoy also has a unique we b-based application called Kwic, which allows you to notify the web and SMS subscribers for active events.

What is a vertical shooting inspection?

A vertical shooting inspection is a function to detect bullets fired from a high altitude.

What is ShotSpotter? Controversial gunshot detection technology facing increasing scrutiny

Critics doubt the system's accuracy and say sensors are concentrated in minority communities. Police say the technology is life-saving.

Shot spotter attached to the camera pole of the summer building. Several cities, including summer buildings, are reconsidering whether to detect gunshots and use ShotSpotter, a network of devices built to support the quick response to firing cases. Jessica Linardi/ Glove Paper Staff

Last week, the Massachusetts representatives in Massachusetts called for the Federal Government to investigate the federation of federal detection systems, saying that there was a possibility of infringing citizenship.

In March, a city council member of Summerville submitted a motion to stop the use of the technology used by the city for 10 years.

Many cities across the U. S., including Chicago, recently decided not to renew their contracts with the system.

The tool in question is ShotSpotter, an audio recording technology designed to detect gunfire and direct officers to crime scenes within minutes.

The relatively little-known system has divided police and civil liberties activists in recent years as part of an ongoing debate over police surveillance, potential discriminatory tactics, and the use of force and technology in policing.

Critics say the system contributes to overpolicing minority communities and is largely inaccurate because it sends officers on high alert into neighborhoods where relations with police are already strained.

Police say the system saves lives and helps first responders get to crime scenes faster in situations where people might not call 911.

The debate over whether to use or keep using the system has taken center stage in town and city councils across the country. But a relative lack of data on the technology and mixed studies showing contrasting results have forced municipalities to make tough decisions.

"What is our internal data, and why are we looking at it?" says Katie Naples-Mitchell, director of the Criminal Justice Policy and Management Program at Harvard University's Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy. "Especially when there are significant concerns about civil rights and communities.

What is ShotSpotter? How does it work?

ShotSpotter, now known as SoundThinking, was founded in 1996 by a physicist and two engineers to pinpoint the epicenter of earthquakes using technology inspired by the work of physicist Robert Shawn. The company's products are now used in more than 160 cities, according to its website.

The technology itself employs acoustic sensors that are mounted high above the road to avoid street noise, according to Tom Chittam, SoundThinking's senior vice president of forensic services. The sensors are triggered by a loud sound that resembles a gunshot.

When each of the three sensors detects a loud sound, an alarm is triggered. The system then calculates the time the sound reached each individual sensor, pinpointing the location of the gunshot, Chittam says.

Wednesday, January 13, 2021 On the Las Vegas Police Department Headquarters in Las Vegas, a Coytle Downy Corporation, who uses the interactive electronic map of the shot spot dispatch program in the Fusion Watch category Director (right). -L. E. Baskow/Las Vegas Review-Journal Via AP

The algorithm determines whether the sound matches the gunshot. The recording will then go to a further review by employees at the SoundThinking Incident Review Center. According to the company, all processes from firing to a police station call center, or a police officer's computer or phone call will take less than a minute.

In order to determine where the sensor is installed, the police station "analyzes past firing and murder case data and provides it to the company." The company later stated in a statement to Boston. com, which will be set up in a place where "gunshot detection is the most needed."

However, this system also has a secret element. Police and municipalities do not know where the individual sensors are installed. According to SoundThinking, this secret is to protect local residents.

The system has been used in Boston, the largest city in the state since 2007. The city paid about $ 1. 5 million to the system introduction, according to WBUR reported in 2011.

Cambridge, Waster, Chelsea, Summerville, and Lawrence are one of the cities contracting with SoundThinking near Boston.

ShotSpotter says its accuracy is 97%, contradicting other studies

The accuracy of this system is one of the most controversial points, and the conclusions vary greatly from various surveys.

SoundThinking claims that the accuracy of 97 % (0. 5 % of the misunderstanding rate) is 97 % based on the independent audit of the system by Edgeworth Economics. The company outsourced the research after MacArthur Judicial Center (MJC) published its own research using Chicago data in 2021.

As an answer to MJC's survey, Edgeworth uses "inappropriate data" and depends on whether or not he has submitted a report to the police in the case. , We have not been able to provide objective evaluation. "

However, in other research, the effectiveness of this technology is shown at various levels. In 2021, Chicago's supervision of the Chicago concluded that only 9. 1 % of the crimes discovered when the Chicago police responded to the warning of the shot spotter was only 9. 1 %.

In the city of Cambridge, Brancville Bird, director of the former police headquarters, wrote a note during a system survey in the 2021 city council, and only 35 were confirmed to be firing out of 105 operations in six years. The data was more than 65 %.

According to the Cambridge Public Safety Commission, 13 arrests were arrested by the system, with the cost of $ 50, 000 annually.

According to a record obtained by Boston. com from Cambridge City, ShotSpotter has been working only five times in the past year. The three records were not disclosed due to the investigation, but the other two (November and April) have been found to be a misinformation due to fireworks.

In Boston, about 250 of the 571 systems that have been operated in the past year, according to a public record claimed by Boston. com, were marked as "firing" or "multiple guns".

Aside from the accuracy of the system, research has indicated that the system has almost no effect on the decrease in firearm s-related crimes. Journal of Public Health magazine research on ShotSpotter data from 1999 to 2016 showed that the introduction of this system did not have a significant effect on firearms related murders and arrests.

"Policy solutions can provide more cos t-effective means to reduce violence by firearms in urban areas," the authors wrote in the research of the research.

“Blind faith in ShotSpotter”: Critics raise concerns of racism, flaws in the system

Cade Clockford, director of the ACLU Massachus Technology Four Liberty Program, has some major concerns about this system, which is not blessed with minorities and blessed communities (most sensors, according to criticisms. He said that he was ove r-cracking on the place where he was being done, and even from a misconception arrest.

In 2020, he was arrested in Chicago for allegedly shooting a car in a car. According to prosecutors, the voice of the shot spotter indicated that Williams had shot a man, but there were almost no evidence except the sound and the videos of the nearby surveillance camera.

"There is no basis for the arrest ... the police officers knew or knew that they knew that they were unreliable to misunderstand Williams and prosecute for murder. He was blindly believed in the evidence, "he said in a lawsuit that Williams has filed against Chicago.

Williams spent 11 months in prison, until the prosecution was dismissed in 2022 due to insufficient evidence. According to Clockford, the case was mainly warned in the minority residential area, causing concerns about enthusiastic police officers, arresting suspects based on the operation of the shot spotter.

On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, Michael Williams answers interviews at Southside, Chicago. Williams said he wouldn't feel safe locally. When he walks in the neighborhood, he searches for a small shot spotter Microphone, which was in danger of being sentenced to life. "Such a device is installed in the poor black community, and there is nothing else.

In another case in Chicago, a police officer who was warned by ShotSpotter fired 14 and 1 5-yea r-olds, which was found to be fireworks. In 2021, 1 3-yea r-old Adam Toledo was shot and killed by a police officer who responded to the operation of ShotSpotter.

Na Pule s-Mitchell says that the hig h-tension situation that the police assume when responding to the warning can be a dangerous mix, although the accuracy of the system is questioned.

"The police are dispatched on the premise that there is a shooting criminal. It is also a very dangerous encounter.

Such an incident only increases the distrust of the local community and the police, and is the opposite of the role of the police that ShotSpotter is aiming for.

"If this happens only in blacks and brown races, and it is likely to occur in black and brown races, the police continue to say that the police are really needed. It will impair the participation of general citizens in crime investigations such as murder and shooting, "says Clockford.

The exact location of the ShotSpotter device is a secret, but it has been found that nearly 70 % of people living in areas with ShotSpotter sensors, according to leak data analyzed by Wired earlier this year, it was black or Latin.

According to the data, many of the Boston sensors are concentrated on Rocksberry and Dochester, one of the most racially varied areas in the city.

Naples-Mitchell adds that the emotions of being constantly monitored and increasing contact with the police are related to the high percentage of physical and mental illnesses such as hypertension. Ta.

"These are the important consequences of the quality and life that affect the mortality rate, which is also related to having a very stressful set of encounters and experiences that form your area. "I may be there," Napples-Mitchell said.

ShotSpotter is also facing critics doubts about whether Mike can pick up the street conversation.

Clockford pointed out a sensor recorded a quarrel on the street with a firing incident in New Bedford in 2011. According to local reports, the system is also picking up in Auckland, California.

The company has strongly denied that the microphone has a voice recording function. In response to Boston. com questions, SoundThinking has concluded that "the risk of audio monitoring is actually extremely low," according to a study by New York University. Mr. Chittam also stated that the sensor microphone would be "not special," but to purge the audio every 30 hours.

Widewise, Clockford does not believe that this crackdown has helped to decrease crime. It is said that the fact that he does not report to the 911 when he hears gunshots is a sign of lack of trust in the police.

"The police are introducing technology to avoid trust issues, not to deal with trust issues," says Clockford.

“Force multiplier”: Police say ShotSpotter alerts save lives

According to the Brookings Research Institute, only 12 % of the firing incident led to the 911 call. This is one of the SoundThinking is the selling point of ShotSpotter.

According to the Wuster Police Paul Sorcer, the system can rush to the crime site even if no one dial to 911, and build a trusting relationship with the local community.

"I'm trying to capture ShotSpotter as a local police program. It's a problem if nobody comes to the community when firearms are fired," says Socia.

According to Boston. com, in 2023, 116 firing incidents occurred in the Woster City, of which 70 were involved in shot spots. Of the 70 cases, 41 were not reported to the police.

In response to critical opinions that this sensor is often used in minorities communities, both Chittam and Sorcie pointed out that the sensor is set up based on past crime data.

"Gun violence is not evenly spreading throughout the country. It affects displacement in many colored communities," says Chittam. "I think ShotSpotter is an essential infrastructure for public safety to protect such a community."

Socia has been using this system since 2014, and for the Wuster Police Station, which has been using a sensor in 8 miles in the city, this system is "this system can rush to the site. He said that it would be "strengthening force."

"You must install it in the area where there are many victims of firing, murder, and firing cases. It will not be installed in areas without firing. I want to meet the police. "

Mr. Chittam acknowledged that the technology occasionally missed the sound of gunfire and heard sounds other than the firing sound.

"As with any technology, it's not perfect. I don't say it's 100 % accurate.

CHITTUM said that it was up to the station to analyze and fix the case of the police to respond to the warning of ShotSpotter, and that ShotSpotter was just a tool that helps the law execution.

"How to use this tool is up to our customers, the police, and (that's) the important part of the effectiveness of this tool.

Boston and Somerville leaders, Massachusetts legislators have concerns about the system

Chicago, one of the most researched and criticized cities, will end a contract with SoundThinking in September at the request of Mayor Brandon Johnson. The city spends $ 9 million a year on the technology, but the mayor pointed out that it was "lacking reliability and overly affected by artificial mistakes."

The Fall River Police Station reported that the use of the system was canceled four years later, with an error rate in the city in 2017, and the use of the system was canceled four years later. According to Herald News, the system cost about $ 90, 000 a year.

In March, Mr. Willie Burnley Jr., a member of the Samarville Congress, submitted an order to cancel the contract between the city and sound thinking, as the sensor "always listening to the sound of gunshots."

Bernly also quoted leak information in the location of the shot spotter and reported that it was installed in areas with many minorities, such as East Summer Building and Professional Hill.

The poor and diverse people of East Summer Building always live in areas where traffic noise, including car backfires, is always at a high level, and always sounds from the "35 sensor" in case of "sound like gunshot". It is being monitored. Burnley wrote that West Summerville wealthy people. "

Earlier this month, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Ed Marky, and House of Representatives Ayana Presley sent a letter to the Ministry of Land and security, and the Federal Rights Law in the Federal Rights Law in the federal government's financial funding to the shot spotter. He urged him to investigate for violating. The law prohibits the federal financial recipients from discriminating by race, skin color, and nationality.

The letter pointed out that the sensor is concentrated in the minority community in the location of the leaked shot spotter. Representatives also state that the system is inaccurate.

"The introduction of a biased system can also permanently crack down on colored races' communities and unjust monitoring, expose the residents into police interrogation and conflict, and create a dangerous situation for residents. It is shown in the letter.

"We are concerned that this defective inefficient technology, which has been subsidized by the federal government, may worsen racial prejudice in crackdowns and violates the Civil Rights Law," said Warren. Was described in a statement sent to Boston. com. "This tool has been biased in a black and brown community, and has been warning on unreasonable monitoring and excessive crackdowns in the colored community."

But Chittam says that those who criticize the technology have pointed out the wrong statistics.

"Critics will mention a hal f-dads city that has not canceled or updated contracts for over 10 years.

In response to the question of the evidence that the shot spotter would reduce the crime rate, Chittam acknowledged that "shot spotter alone is not a solution."

"There is no single solution in the US gun shooting case.

However, Clockford believes that the funds that will be introduced in the shot spotter can be implemented in a better way. < SPAN> Poor and diverse people of East Summerville live in areas where traffic noise, including car backfire, is always at a high level, and in case of "sound like gunshot", "35 sensors" I am always being monitored. Burnley wrote that West Summerville wealthy people. "

Newsletter Signup

What happens in Vegas… is captured on camera

The letter pointed out that the sensor is concentrated in the minority community in the location of the leaked shot spotter. Representatives also state that the system is inaccurate.

We meet:

But Chittam says that those who criticize the technology have pointed out the wrong statistics.
"Critics will mention a hal f-dads city that has not canceled or updated contracts for over 10 years.
In response to the question of the evidence that the shot spotter would reduce the crime rate, Chittam acknowledged that "shot spotter alone is not a solution."
Advertising:

Credits:

"There is no single solution in the US gun shooting case.

Full episode transcript:

However, Clockford believes that the funds that will be introduced in the shot spotter can be implemented in a better way. The poor and diverse people of East Summer Building always live in areas where traffic noise, including car backfires, is always at a high level, and always sounds from the "35 sensor" in case of "sound like gunshot". It is being monitored. Burnley wrote that West Summerville wealthy people. "

The letter pointed out that the sensor is concentrated in the minority community in the location of the leaked shot spotter. Representatives also state that the system is inaccurate.

But Chittam says that those who criticize the technology have pointed out the wrong statistics.

"Critics will mention a hal f-dads city that has not canceled or updated contracts for over 10 years.

In response to the question of the evidence that the shot spotter would reduce the crime rate, Chittam acknowledged that "shot spotter alone is not a solution."

Advertising:

"There is no single solution in the US gun shooting case.

However, Clockford believes that the funds that will be introduced in the shot spotter can be implemented in a better way.

"We've seen no evidence that it benefits public safety and that it actually harms civil rights," they say. "Public officials... should really be asking themselves: Is there something we can do with this money that doesn't harm civil rights and civil liberties, but instead helps address the underlying problem of distrust in communities?"

Get the latest news from Boston. com.

Police departments across the country are using facial recognition in a variety of ways, but there's little consensus on best practices.

August 12, 2020

Police use of facial recognition has come under a lot of scrutiny. In part three of a four-part series on facial recognition, host Jennifer Strong takes a look at Sin City. She also explores why celebrities like Woody Harrelson are taking center stage in conversations about the technology.

Albert Fox Cahn, Founder, Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S. T. O. P.) Phil Mayor, Senior Staff Attorney, ACLU of Michigan Capt. Dori Coren, Las Vegas Police Department Deputy Chief Armando Aguilar, Miami Police Department This episode was written and produced by Jennifer Strong, Tate Ryan-Mosley, and Emma Silekens, with assistance from Benji Rosen and Karen Hao. Edited by Michael Reilly and Gideon Litchfield. Technical Director is Jacob Gorski. Jennifer Strong: So, we're on one of New York's busiest bridges, the RFK Bridge. We're driving on a bridge. Why are we doing this? Because the MTA just rolled out live facial recognition. In fact, we're about to go under it right now. Can you see the cameras pointed at our faces? They're putting these all over the city right now. They're putting them on a lot of bridges and tunnels, but we're in this tunnel because this is where it all started. They're supposed to read our faces, at least in theory, through our windshield. And the crazy thing about this, well, the crazy thing is, nobody knew there was a test. How many faces do you think were captured during the test? What do you think? And by the way, this is your producer, Emma Cillekens.

Emma Cillekens: Thousands, maybe millions? This is New York, so it could be millions.

Jennifer Strong: No. Zero %. But they went forward and proceeded anyway.

Andrew Cuomo: The introduction of cashless rates is not actually a fee collection. It's about introducing an unprecedented electronic system.

JENNIFER STRONG: This is Andrew Kuomo, Governor of New York State who gives a speech at the 2018 event.

Andrew Cuomo (Andrew Kuomo): Read all license plates through that intersection and introduce a system that reports to a police car placed within 5 seconds.

Jennifer Strong: But this is neither a technical event nor about crackdowns. It celebrates that the repair of the tunnel connecting Brooklyn and Manhattan is over. In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, the subway and tunnel in the city were flooded with seawater. It was necessary to exchange all electronic devices and wiring, and I had the opportunity to challenge new things.

Andrew Cuomo: We are now shifting to face recognition technology, and we are at a completely new level, looking at the faces of people in the car and matching them with the database.

Jennifer Strong (Jennifer Strong): And they are trying to be even more advanced than reading their faces and license plates. I'm trying to read people's ears.

Andrew Cuomo: When you look at security cameras, people often get stuck. So they may be incredible now, but they are experimenting with their ears alone.

Jennifer Strong: Jennifer Strong. Part 3 of the series related to the police and face recognition. In this episode, let's take a closer look at how this technology is used in various cities and meet the police chief who helps the decision.

Jennifer Strong (Jennifer): It is not only the road that the New York City Transportation Bureau is experimenting with face authentication. However, due to the lack of rules about how face authentication is used, we often call on Twitter on Twitter, as a reporter on the New York Times on the subway. You will know by chance.

Albert Fox Khan: This is a monitor installed at a tim e-square subway station, indicating that there is a yellow box around people's faces, using minimal facial authentication technology. If you don't have a face

Jennifer Strong: Albert Fox Khan is the founder of a monitoring and technology monitoring project. Commonly known as STOP. He saw the tweet and contacted the transportation MTA, but they said they did not respond much.

Albert Fox Khan: So we appealed for MTA. The MTA did not explain how the monitor was used, how face recognition is being performed, and what is the purpose of installing the monitor in the first place without any explanation. This is not a face recognition. We just wanted to make citizens threaten to think that they were recognizing their face so that they would not have to pay the fare.

Jennifer Strong: But he's not only threatening tactics. He has been discussing how to use this technology with the New York Police for years.

Albert Fox Khan: You have incredible powerful techniques, but it's already a kind of error or some kind of bias. The New York Police are trying to use that risk more prominent. I'm sending a picture of Doppelganger, but I have no idea how many times this has been done.

Jennifer Strong: There is also the name of a celebrity comparison. A few years ago, an investigator was looking for a suspect who stole a beer at a drugstore in New York. The camera captured his face, but it wasn't enough to match the face recognition system. One detective realized that the suspect was a bit similar to the actor Woody Harrelson, and was consistent as a system. I don't know how often this happens, but it's certainly not once or twice. In another example of the New York Police, New York Nicks players are replacing the suspect.

Albert Fox Khan: Using a photo of a celebrity is to divert someone's image for this kind of purpose, which is very problematic. There is no evidence that this is accurate.

Jennifer Strong: Another way he is looking for is to handle images in Photoshop by the police manually. Face recognition often doesn't recognize your eyes closed. So some police paste photos open to get results. In some cases, photos may be processed in other ways.

Albert Fox Khan: If your mouth is open, close your mouth at Photoshop. If you can't see a part of the face, you may see a copy and paste a part of another image in Google images to create a composite image that allows you to recognize the face recognition algorithm as a human face. Despite the incredible powerful tools, it is very fragile, and it is enough to make sure that the face recognition algorithm can actually be collided, even if one eye is crushed. That's it.

Jennifer Strong: And in some places, including New York, I don't even know what tools the police have.

Albert Fox Khan: But even the officials and the city council we chose do not know what kind of tool they are using. The fact that the police are moving without any monitoring threatens democracy itself, but as long as you do not know that the tool is used in the first place, it is not necessary to boost the citizens necessary to prohibit them. It is possible.

Jennifer Strong: But this is changing. This summer, the city passed the "Open Monitoring Method of Surveillance Technology" (POST method). This is an obligation to disclose the basic information about what monitoring technology, how it works, how often it is used, and how often it is used. It targets a variety of technologies, such as location information, tracker, automatic license plate reader, body camera, social media monitoring software. Of course, it is a face recognition, but this is not a new bill. I've been left for the last three years.

Albert Fox Khan: The drastic reform, as seen in New York, would not have been realized without the amazing protests and rebellies seen in the city and in the country. Thanks to that, the debate over the crackdown of this city has fundamentally changed.

Jennifer Strong: ACLU is also an organization that works on the same puzzle. A no n-profit organization that focuses on personal rights and freedom. Especially in the case of Robert Williams, which we met in the first episode, we are frankly appealing for the need for facial ID regulation.

Robert Williams: Until he talked to a detective, he did not know that they were using face recognition or such things. < SPAN> Albert Fox Khan: If your mouth is open, close your mouth at Photoshop. If you can't see a part of the face, you may see a copy and paste a part of another image in Google images to create a composite image that allows you to recognize the face recognition algorithm as a human face. Despite the incredible powerful tools, it is very fragile, and it is enough to make sure that the face recognition algorithm can actually be collided, even if one eye is crushed. That's it.

Jennifer Strong: And in some places, including New York, I don't even know what tools the police have.

Robert Williams: Until he talked to a detective, he did not know that they were using face recognition or such things. Albert Fox Khan: If your mouth is open, close your mouth at Photoshop. If you can't see a part of the face, you may see a copy and paste a part of another image in Google images to create a composite image that allows you to recognize the face recognition algorithm as a human face. Despite the incredible powerful tools, it is very fragile, and it is enough to make sure that the face recognition algorithm can actually be collided, even if one eye is crushed. That's it.

Jennifer Strong: And in some places, including New York, I don't even know what tools the police have.

Robert Williams: Until he talked to a detective, he did not know that they were using face recognition or such things.

Melissa Williams: I never thought this would happen. I never thought this would happen. I saw the news about facial recognition and how it was being used. I never thought the police would show up at my door and arrest my husband. So I want other people to know that this can happen and it has happened. It shouldn't happen.

Jennifer Strong: Melissa and her husband are represented by Phil Mayor, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Michigan.

Phil Mayor: The Williams lawyer said that in all his years of defending criminal defendants, this was the first time he actually found out that his client had been identified by facial recognition technology. And again, it wasn't revealed in court. He found out because the police said something by chance. So I'm convinced that people who were convicted through plea bargains are in prison today because computers made the same kind of mistake that Williams did.

Jennifer Strong: But even if no one is arrested, there could be real harm from the fake matches being made public.

Amara Majeed: I woke up in my dorm room on the morning of the 25th of January, in the middle of final exams, to 35 missed calls, all of them frantically informing me that I had been misidentified as one of the terrorists involved in the recent Easter Sunday attacks in my beloved homeland, Sri Lanka.

Jennifer Strong: Amara Majeed was 22 years old and a senior at Brown University. She had been misidentified by an algorithm.

Amara Majeed: There are no words to express the pain of being associated with such a heinous attack on my own birthplace and people. The photos and posts that misrepresented me have damaged my family's peace of mind and put our family's lives at risk.

Jennifer Strong: Sri Lankan authorities later apologized for the mistake, but not before she was harassed, trolled, and threatened on social media. This is all. Policy, transparency, and oversight regarding face ID vary radically from place to place, and even if there were rules to prevent this from happening, they would be meaningless if they were followed. Join us next time to learn about some police departments that are tackling the issue.

Jennifer Strong: The New York Police announced their face ID policy in March after nearly 10 years of public opinion pressure, but other police stations have been more aggressive with citizens in this case. Inspector Dori Colen is a commander who supervises the Las Vegas Strip district. And he told me about the hig h-tech monitoring room that would appear on a criminal program. I can't visit that command directly because of Coronavirus. So he explained.

Dori Koren (DK): It's a bit like Hollywood, but I wanted to make that kind of atmosphere. Imagine that there is a huge display on the front wall and all kinds of camera images are projected like the monitoring room.

Jennifer Strong: Everything in this room is connected. When the sound sensor detects a firing, alerts flow, and there are many other things that police want to know, and these ID techniques are all displayed on large lattice maps. Therefore, people and events can be placed in a specific place almost in real time. And it's like talking to the whole city. Las Vegas is a pioneering smart city in Japan, and is embedded everywhere, up to trash cans. According to Inspector Kolen, face authentication has revolutionized the crackdown. It is not just a crime, but can stand before the crime.

Dori Koren: For us, face authentication has greatly helped rescue and prevent violent crimes.

Jennifer Strong: He says that police officers have been able to identify criminal patterns in real time.

Dori Kolen: The second robbery had just occurred at a convenience store, and perhaps the phase of the suspect who entered the robbery was the same color as the robbery case 10 minutes ago. 。 Or the same car. Or the same action. By grasping these patterns and sending them in real time, you can prevent the third and fourth robbery.

Jennifer Strong: And they will be happy to talk about it. < SPAN> Jennifer Strong: The New York Police announced the face ID policy in March after nearly 10 years of public opinion pressure, but other police stations have been more aggressive with citizens in this case. 。 Inspector Dori Colen is a commander who supervises the Las Vegas Strip district. And he told me about the hig h-tech monitoring room that would appear on a criminal program. I can't visit that command directly because of Coronavirus. So he explained.

Dori Koren: For us, face authentication has greatly helped rescue and prevent violent crimes.

Jennifer Strong: He says that police officers have been able to identify criminal patterns in real time.

Jennifer Strong: And they will be happy to talk about that. Jennifer Strong: The New York Police announced their face ID policy in March after nearly 10 years of public opinion pressure, but other police stations have been more aggressive with citizens in this case. Inspector Dori Colen is a commander who supervises the Las Vegas Strip district. And he told me about the hig h-tech monitoring room that would appear on a criminal program. I can't visit that command directly because of Coronavirus. So he explained.

Elim Poon - Journalist, Creative Writer

Last modified: 27.08.2024

ShotSpotter, a gunshot detection technology company, is expanding by steering federal grants to police departments and firing back against. Traffic sign recognition is a complex and challenging yet popular problem that can assist drivers on the road and reduce traffic accidents. Overview In , the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a grant effectiveness case study of the Las Vegas urban area to.

Play

accepted