Calforna Sports Bettng Proposed by CA Lawmakers

This Google ™ translation function provided on the legislative analysis office (LAO) website is for information only.

LAO cannot guarantee the accuracy of this translation, so we are not responsible for the incorrect information caused by the translation application tool.

Choose your language:

Ballot Pages

• Initiative Financial Analysis (Before Voting)
• Proposal analysis
• Voting measures by type from 1974 to the present
• Bond bond
• Outline of general bonds-Election results from 1986 to the present (Excel file)
• LA O-related publications

A.G. File No. 2023-031

December 18, 2023

In accordance with Article 9005 of the Election Law, we examined the constitutional status of sports gambling (A. G. File 23-0031).

Background

The Gambling State Law in California restricts the types of gambling in California. For example, state law is currently banning sports gambling in California. However, the state law has acknowledged a specific gaming. This includes tribal gambling at casinos, state lottery, card rooms that run a specific card game, and horse racing gambling. < SPAN> This Google ™ translation function provided on the legislative analysis office (LAO) website is intended for information only.

LAO cannot guarantee the accuracy of this translation, so we are not responsible for the incorrect information caused by the translation application tool.

Proposal

Initiative Financial Analysis (Before Voting)

Proposal analysis

Fiscal Effects

Voting measures by type from 1974 to the present

Bond bond

Outline of general bonds-Election results from 1986 to the present (Excel file)

• LA O-related publications
• December 18, 2023

In accordance with Article 9005 of the Election Law, we examined the constitutional status of sports gambling (A. G. File 23-0031).The Gambling State Law in California restricts the types of gambling in California. For example, state law is currently banning sports gambling in California. However, the state law has acknowledged a specific gaming. This includes tribal gambling at casinos, state lottery, card rooms that run a specific card game, and horse racing gambling. This Google ™ translation function provided on the legislative analysis office (LAO) website is for information only.

What’s next for sports betting in California?

LAO cannot guarantee the accuracy of this translation, so we are not responsible for the incorrect information caused by the translation application tool.

Initiative Financial Analysis (Before Voting)

Proposal analysis

Voting measures by type from 1974 to the present

Bond bond

Outline of general bonds-Election results from 1986 to the present (Excel file)

LA O-related publications

December 18, 2023

In accordance with Article 9005 of the Election Law, we examined the constitutional status of sports gambling (A. G. File 23-0031).

The Gambling State Law in California restricts the types of gambling in California. For example, state law is currently banning sports gambling in California. However, the state law has acknowledged a specific gaming. This includes tribal gambling at casinos, state lottery, card rooms that run a specific card game, and horse racing gambling.

Tribal-State Compacts. Native American tribes have a special status under federal law. Specifically, tribes have certain rights to govern themselves without interference from states. As a result, state regulation of tribal casinos and other activities conducted on Native American lands is generally limited to those permitted under (1) federal law and (2) federally recognized compacts negotiated between tribes and states (known as tribal-state compacts). For example, federal law permits federally recognized tribes to operate certain types of games (e. g., slot machines) on Native American lands in states that permit such games. If a tribe seeks to offer gaming on its lands, federal law requires the state to negotiate a compact with the tribe that specifies how gaming will be conducted, regulated, and enforced. Such agreements also require gaming tribes to make certain payments to non-gaming tribes, states, local governments, and other parties. However, federal courts have ruled that payments to state and local governments should generally be limited to amounts necessary to cover regulatory costs, compensation to mitigate the negative effects of gaming, distributions to other tribes, and other costs associated with gaming activities. Gaming compacts can be renegotiated under certain conditions, such as if additional gaming activities are permitted in the state. If the state and tribe cannot reach an agreement, the tribe can ask the federal government to pay the expenses necessary to conduct gaming.

Authorizes the Legislature to allow tribes to conduct sports betting. This bill would authorize the Legislature to enact legislation amending the state constitution to allow federally recognized Native American tribes to conduct sports betting, either in person or online. If such legislation is enacted, the bill would also authorize the state to negotiate a tribe-state compact or amend an existing compact to allow for the conduct of sports betting.

1. Imposes restrictions on sports betting. If new or amended compacts are approved with tribes seeking to conduct sports betting, this measure would require those compacts to include certain sports betting regulations. At a minimum, those regulations must limit betting to (1) those 21 years of age or older, (2) professional or collegiate athletics that do not involve animals other than horses, and (3) amateur athletics that do not involve children under 18 years of age. In addition, the measure provides that those regulations must also include provisions for consumer protection, ensuring the integrity of sporting events, and making payments to non-gaming tribes and "California residents."

How did this happen?

No direct fiscal effect. This bill would permit, but not require, the Legislature to enact bills permitting sports betting, and would therefore have no immediate effect on the costs and revenues of state and local governments.

Potential impact when a legislative government has approved a sports gambling. If a legislative government has enacted a bill to approve sports gambling, and then sports gambling is implemented, the cost and income of state and local governments may increase. At least, it is likely that state and / or regional costs will increase to regulate sports gambling. At the same time, state and/ or local income may increase due to necessary fees (such as regulatory fees), payment (such as distribution of sports gambling income), or tax revenues from economic activities related to sports gambling. However, it is generally reduced the adverse effects of gaming activities, regulations, and the cost of gaming, and gaming, generally, the approval of gaming activities, regulations, and the costs of the state government and local governments caused by directors. Limited to compensation for compensation and distribution to other tribes. Therefore, it is expected that the country and/ or local income will increase at least to partially or completely offset such expenses. However, the actual scale of the state and local governments and the increase in income is very uncertain, the number of tribes that choose to provide sports gambling, the only way to the general public participating in sports gambling. It depends on the bill enacted by a legislative office that approves sports gambling, and the details of the tribes and state compacts that are later negotiated. The main details of the bill and / or compact, which can have a significant impact on the size of the financial effect, are specific sports gambling activities (whether both interpersonal and online sports gambling are allowed. It includes, the types of games that can be bet, etc.), adopted regulatory structures, and specific payments.

Outline of financial effects. This measure is thought to have the following financial effects to state and local governments.

The legislature can allow sports gambling, but there is no need to allow it, so there is no direct financial effect on state and local governments. < SPAN> Potential impact when legislative authority has approved a sports gambling. If a legislative government has enacted a bill to approve sports gambling, and then sports gambling is implemented, the cost and income of state and local governments may increase. At least, it is likely that state and / or regional costs will increase to regulate sports gambling. At the same time, state and/ or local income may increase due to necessary fees (such as regulatory fees), payment (such as distribution of sports gambling income), or tax revenues from economic activities related to sports gambling. However, it is generally reduced the adverse effects of gaming activities, regulations, and the cost of gaming, and gaming, generally, the approval of gaming activities, regulations, and the costs of the state government and local governments caused by directors. Limited to compensation for compensation and distribution to other tribes. Therefore, it is expected that the country and/ or local income will increase at least to partially or completely offset such expenses. However, the actual scale of the state and local governments and the increase in income is very uncertain, the number of tribes that choose to provide sports gambling, the only thing that the general public participates in sports gambling. It depends on the bill enacted by a legislative office that approves sports gambling, and the details of the tribes and state compacts that are later negotiated. The main details of the bill and / or compact, which can have a significant impact on the size of the financial effect, are specific sports gambling activities (whether both interpersonal and online sports gambling are allowed. It includes, the types of games that can be bet, etc.), adopted regulatory structures, and specific payments.

Outline of financial effects. This measure is thought to have the following financial effects to state and local governments.

The legislature can allow sports gambling, but there is no need to allow it, so there is no direct financial effect on state and local governments. Potential impact when a legislative government has approved a sports gambling. If the legislative government has enacted a bill to approve sports gambling, and then sports gambling is implemented, the cost and income of the state and local governments may increase. At least, it is likely that state and / or regional costs will increase to regulate sports gambling. At the same time, state and/ or local income may increase due to necessary fees (such as regulatory fees), payment (such as distribution of sports gambling income), or tax revenues from economic activities related to sports gambling. However, it is generally reduced the adverse effects of gaming activities, regulations, and the cost of gaming, and gaming, generally, the approval of gaming activities, regulations, and the costs of the state government and local governments caused by directors. Limited to compensation for compensation and distribution to other tribes. Therefore, it is expected that the country and/ or local income will increase at least to partially or completely offset such expenses. However, the actual scale of the state and local governments and the increase in income is very uncertain, the number of tribes that choose to provide sports gambling, the only thing that the general public participates in sports gambling. It depends on the bill enacted by a legislative office that approves sports gambling, and the details of the tribes and state compacts that are later negotiated. The main details of the bill and / or compact, which can have a significant impact on the size of the financial effect, are specific sports gambling activities (whether both interpersonal and online sports gambling are allowed. It includes, the type of game that can be bet, the recruited regulation structure, and the required payments are included.

Does anyone come out on top?

Outline of financial effects. This measure is thought to have the following financial effects to state and local governments.

The legislature can allow sports gambling, but there is no direct financial effect on state and local governments because there is no need to permit.

If the legislative government has approved a sports gambling, the cost and income of the state and local governments are uncertain, and will depend on various factors, including concrete regulations and other requirements. In general, federal courts are to provide payments from tribes to state and local governments to reduce the adverse effects of regulations, other costs, gaming, and distribution to other tribes. It is limited to the required amount.

Subscription ｜ California Council ｜ Online voter registration ｜ Privacy Policy ｜ Accessibility

Legal Analysis Office ｜ California Council's Boat-oriented Finance / Policy Advisor 925 L Street, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 445-4656 | INFORMATION

The voters have rejected the 26th and the 27th proposal, but the debate over California's sports betting has not ended. However, the debate over Sportsbetting in California has not yet been completed.

What comes next?

Welcome to Calmatters. This is the only no n-management news room that only deals with problems that influence all California people. If you register for Whatmatters, we will provide the latest news and commentary on California's most important issues.

The fierce (and sometimes confusion) battle over sports betting, which has accumulated nearly $ 500 million election funds and floods advertisements in California, ended on Tuesday evening.

What is the result? Nothing changes.

Voters have rejected two separate bills legalizing sports betting. California seems to be the first state that stopped all sports betting in the ballot box.

Proposal 26, which was invested by about 12 Native American tribes, allows the tribal casino and fac e-t o-face sportsbating at four private racetracks. Approximately 30 % of the votes compiled today have supported the bill and about 70 % opposed.

2022 Election

The 27th proposal, which was supposed to be online sports betting, is likely to have a historic defeat. The opposition is 83 % and only 17 % agree, and it is likely to be the worst defeat in California's last 100 years.

The bill was operated by a handful of major game companies such as Fanduel, DraftKings, and BetMGM. He gained the support of the tribes, but was strongly opposed by more than 50 tribes and tribal tissue.

Will there be another ballot measure?

"Everybody knows this," said Victor Rocha, president of the Indian Gaming Association.

"The money they spent and the results are terrible," said Bill Pascrell III, a veteran gambling industry lobbyist.

CalMatters reached out to DraftKings, FanDuel and BetMGM for interviews. All three companies referred CalMatters to campaign spokespeople. "Our coalition knew passing Prop. 27 would be a difficult road," said CalMatters president and CEO, John F. Kennedy. "This election campaign has made clear our determination for California to follow more than half the country in legalizing safe, responsible online sports betting.

more on propositions 26 and 27

Fact checking ads for California’s sports betting propositions

Become a CalMatters member today to stay informed, power bipartisan news, and expand your knowledge across California.

Even before the campaign was in full swing, Californians weren't all that enthusiastic about sports betting. When pollsters from the Institute for Governmental Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, asked voters in February whether they would support a constitutional amendment to legalize sports betting, 45% indicated they would vote "yes," while 33% indicated they would vote "no."

California sports betting initiative backed by FanDuel, DraftKings would block small competitors

As the election campaign progressed, support dropped and opposition grew dramatically. By early November, 53% of voters said they opposed in-person betting and 64% opposed online betting. In general, support for initiatives tends to decline as the election approaches. Californians were bombarded with ads, some of which made misleading claims or didn't mention sports betting at all. A University of California, Berkeley poll found that voters who saw a lot of these ads were more likely to oppose them than those who saw few.

Calforna Sports Bettng Proposed by CA Lawmakers

This Google ™ translation function provided on the legislative analysis office (LAO) website is for information only.

LAO cannot guarantee the accuracy of this translation, so we are not responsible for the incorrect information caused by the translation application tool.

Choose your language:

Ballot Pages

• Initiative Financial Analysis (Before Voting)
• Proposal analysis
• Voting measures by type from 1974 to the present
• Bond bond
• Outline of general bonds-Election results from 1986 to the present (Excel file)
• LA O-related publications

A.G. File No. 2023-030

December 18, 2023

There is nothing certain about the future of Sportsbetting in California. One year, just because voters say "no" cannot prevent the idea in the next election or in the next election. That is the case: California has rejected Initiative, which adds its third regulations on dialysis clinics since 2018.

Background

Gaming companies that support online betting do not seem to escape from California.

• "Tens of local governments and countless local governments have benefited from the large tax revenue brought about online sports betting, and online sports as California faced tax revenue and opaque economic headwinds. Betting can provide a substantial solution that fills the shortage of future budgets, "said click, a spokeswoman for proposed No. 27 supporters.
• "California is currently making billions of betting on an illegal offshore sports betting site every year, which does not protect minors and consumers, and can provide support for state priority. A safe and untreated company is worthy of a safe, responsible and taxable online sports market.
• In addition, some tribal leaders do not deny the possibility of bidding again in the future. According to Mark Macaro, the leader of Pechana Band of Indians, "as a tribe, we analyze this result, and what is the future of sports gambling in California? We will discuss in a group. "
• 2022 The latest report of the California General Election < SPAN> Sportsbetting in California is nothing certain. One year, just because voters say "no" cannot prevent the idea in the next election or in the next election. That is the case: California has rejected Initiative, which adds its third regulations on dialysis clinics since 2018.

Gaming companies that support online betting do not seem to escape from California.

LAO cannot guarantee the accuracy of this translation, so we are not responsible for the incorrect information caused by the translation application tool.

Proposal

"California is currently making billions of betting on an illegal offshore sports betting site every year, which does not protect minors and consumers, and can provide support for state priority. A safe and untreated company is worthy of a safe, responsible and taxable online sports market.

In addition, some tribal leaders do not deny the possibility of bidding again in the future. According to Mark Macaro, the leader of Pechana Band of Indians, "as a tribe, we analyze this result, and what is the future of sports gambling in California? We will discuss in a group. "

2022 There is nothing certain about the future of Sportsbetting in California, the California General Election. One year, just because voters say "no" cannot prevent the idea in the next election or in the next election. That is the case: California has rejected Initiative, which adds its third regulations on dialysis clinics since 2018.

Gaming companies that support online betting do not seem to escape from California.

"Tens of local governments and countless local governments have benefited from the large tax revenue brought about online sports betting, and online sports as California faced tax revenue and opaque economic headwinds. Betting can provide a substantial solution that fills the shortage of future budgets, "said click, a spokeswoman for proposed No. 27 supporters.

"California is currently making billions of betting on an illegal offshore sports betting site every year, which does not protect minors and consumers, and can provide support for state priority. A safe and untreated company is worthy of a safe, responsible and taxable online sports market.

In addition, some tribal leaders do not deny the possibility of bidding again in the future. According to Mark Macaro, the leader of Pechana Band of Indians, "as a tribe, we analyze this result, and what is the future of sports gambling in California? We will discuss in a group. "

2022's latest report of California General Election

There are two ways to r e-challenge the legalization of sports betting. The first is to go through the voting bills, where you can get into the initiative, collect signatures, and to get to vote if everything goes well. Another option is to cooperate with the state council. II Nelson Rose, a gambling expert and emeritus Professor of Wittia Rose School, says that the state parliament may pass law to allow new gambling. Alternatively, the legislature can pass the constitutional amendment and vote for voters. In 2019 and 2020, the state council examined a amendment to legalize sports betting, but the complex negotiations between different gambling stakeholders were not solved in time, and the initiatives have disappeared. According to a statement, Democratic Senator Bill Dod, who created a 2019 legislative proposal, said, "I am ready to mediate any agreement if the people involved are interested in working on this issue again. " Did this year's great failure open up a smoother path? "I don't think the mechanics has changed," says Adam Gray, a member of the Democratic Council, who c o-written in 2019 amendments. The only thing that changed was, "It's $ 450 million in a bank account before, now in some consultant pockets."

Fiscal Effects

This year's election voting is still under aggregation, so the 2024 election campaign may not start for a while. Also, it is not clear whether the tribe will agree to the approach, even if the tribe proceeds with another proposal. "It is our idea that no matter what the tribe is, it must be supported by voters," he said, Pechana Band of, who supported the tribal sports betting bill this year. Indians Mhiaia says. According to the results of Tuesday night, "Most of California voters say" no "in legalization of online games.

"Tribes can wait forever. No sports betting is needed. California does not need sports betting." Victor Rocha chairman of the US Indian Gaming Association. < SPAN> There are two ways to r e-challenge the legalization of sports betting. The first is to go through the voting bills, where you can get into the initiative, collect signatures, and to get to vote if everything goes well. Another option is to cooperate with the state council. II Nelson Rose, a gambling expert and emeritus Professor of Wittia Rose School, says that the state parliament may pass law to allow new gambling. Alternatively, the legislature can pass the constitutional amendment and vote for voters. In 2019 and 2020, the state council examined a amendment to legalize sports betting, but the complex negotiations between different gambling stakeholders were not solved in time, and the initiatives have disappeared. According to a statement, Democratic Senator Bill Dod, who created a 2019 legislative proposal, said, "I am ready to mediate any agreement if the people involved are interested in working on this issue again. " Did this year's great failure open up a smoother path? "I don't think the mechanics has changed," says Adam Gray, a member of the Democratic Council, who c o-written in 2019 amendments. The only thing that changed was, "It's $ 450 million in a bank account before, now in some consultant pockets."

This year's election voting is still under aggregation, so the 2024 election campaign may not start for a while. Also, it is not clear whether the tribe will agree to the approach, even if the tribe proceeds with another proposal. "It is our idea that no matter what the tribe is, it must be supported by voters," he said, Pechana Band of, who supported the tribal sports betting bill this year. Indians Mhiaia says. According to the results of Tuesday night, "Most of California voters say" no "in legalization of online games.

"Tribes can wait forever. No sports betting is needed. California does not need sports betting." Victor Rocha chairman of the US Indian Gaming Association. There are two ways to r e-challenge the legalization of sports betting. The first is to go through the voting bills, where you can get into the initiative, collect signatures, and to get to vote if everything goes well. Another option is to cooperate with the state council. II Nelson Rose, a gambling expert and emeritus Professor of Wittia Rose School, says that the state parliament may pass law to allow new gambling. Alternatively, the legislature can pass the constitutional amendment and vote for voters. In 2019 and 2020, the state council examined a amendment to legalize sports betting, but the complex negotiations between different gambling stakeholders were not solved in time, and the initiatives have disappeared. According to a statement, Democratic Senator Bill Dod, who created a 2019 legislative proposal, said, "I am ready to mediate any agreement if the people involved are interested in working on this issue again. " Did this year's great failure open up a smoother path? "I don't think the mechanics has changed," says Adam Gray, a member of the Democratic Council, who c o-written in 2019 amendments. The only thing that changed was, "It's $ 450 million in a bank account before, now in some consultant pockets."

Outline of general bonds-Election results from 1986 to the present (Excel file)

• "Tribes can wait forever. No sports betting is needed. California does not need sports betting." Victor Rocha chairman of the US Indian Gaming Association.
• However, another tribal group, such as San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Linkon Band of LuiSeno Indians, proposed a third sports betting legalization measure. These tribes acknowledged that sports betting would be provided directly or online. It was not in time for the 2022 voting, and it was not possible to collect signatures enough to be in time for voting in 2024. "Our group is the best way for California's online sports gambling (this bill) is the best way for online sports gambling in California." Says Roger Salazar, a person. But the tribe may not be in a hurry. "The tribes can be waited forever. No sports betting is needed. California does not need sports betting," says Rocha of the Indian Gaming Association. "Is the industry needed, but does the people need it? Sportsbetting companies can also provide funds to other votes, but in the short term, it may not be the wise action. Pasclell, a gambling lobbyist, says, "The same result will be the same." "You can take a step back from California for a while, wait for the situation to settle down, and reset it," he added. In the meantime, he said that companies could concentrate on other states, which may be able to start online, casino and poker, which are more profitable than sports betting. "We must respect tribes with enormous resources and funds. However, other tribal groups such as San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Linkon Band of Lui Seno Indians. These tribes were proposed directly or online in 2022, not in time. "Our group is the best way for California's online sports gambling (our group) is the best way to collect signatures." Roger Salazar, a public relations officer in the coalition, including these tribes, has been developed. But the tribe may not be in a hurry. "The tribes can be waited forever. No sports betting is needed. California does not need sports betting," says Rocha of the Indian Gaming Association. "Is the industry needed, but does the people need it? Sportsbetting companies can also provide funds to other votes, but in the short term, it may not be the wise action. Pasclell, a gambling lobbyist, says, "The same result will be the same." "You can take a step back from California for a while, wait for the situation to settle down, and reset it," he added. In the meantime, he said that companies could concentrate on other states, which may be able to start online, casino and poker, which are more profitable than sports betting. "We must respect tribes with huge resources and funds, but other tribal groups, including San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Linkon Band of Lui Seno Indians, are the third sports. These tribes have been proposed directly or online in 2022, and recently voted in 2022. "Our group is the best way for online sports gambling in California (our group) (our group is)". Roger Salazar, a coalition spokeswoman, including these tribes, says Roger Sarazar. But the tribe may not be in a hurry. "The tribes can be waited forever. No sports betting is needed. California does not need sports betting," says Rocha of the Indian Gaming Association. "Is the industry needed, but does the people need it? Sportsbetting companies can also provide funds to other votes, but in the short term, it may not be the wise action. Pasclell, a gambling lobbyist, says, "The same result will be the same." "You can take a step back from California for a while, wait for the situation to settle down, and reset it," he added. In the meantime, he said that companies could concentrate on other states, which may be able to start online, casino and poker, which are more profitable than sports betting. "We must respect tribes with enormous resources and funds.

In accordance with Article 9005 of the Election Law, we examined the constitutional status of sports gambling (A. G. File 23-0031).The Gambling State Law in California restricts the types of gambling in California. For example, state law is currently banning sports gambling in California. However, the state law has acknowledged a specific gaming. This includes tribal gambling at casinos, state lottery, card rooms that run a specific card game, and horse racing gambling. This Google ™ translation function provided on the legislative analysis office (LAO) website is for information only.